Share |
Showing posts with label nuclear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nuclear. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

North Korea will COLLAPSE if it continues to divert funds to its nuclear weapons programme, warns Seoul


North Korea will COLLAPSE if it continues to divert funds to its nuclear weapons programme, warns Seoul
South Korean President Park Geun-Hye vows to 'break North Korea's will'
Closure of joint-run factory was 'just the beginning' of a 'strong' response
Park said Kim Jong-Un had diverted workers' salaries to bomb programme
Seoul to make NK 'bitterly realise it can't survive' with nuclear development
http://dollars-vedioonline.blogspot.com/2016/02/north-korea-will-collapse-if-it.html


North Korea will collapse if it does not abandon its nuclear bomb programme, South Korea's president has warned.
In a speech to the National Assembly, Park Geun-Hye said a fundamentally new approach was needed to derail Kim Jong-Un's pursuit of an atomic weapon.
She warned that South Koreans had, over the years, become 'numb' to the threat from their northern neighbour and said it was now time to take a more courageous stand.
Her speech came a week after Park took the unprecedented step of shutting down operations at the jointly run Kaesong industrial estate, triggering an aggressive response from Pyongyang.



Defending the closure, Park said it was 'just the beginning' and signalled further steps that she argued were needed to derail the North's nuclear programme.
'The government will take stronger and more effective measures to make North Korea bitterly realise that it cannot survive with nuclear development and that it will only speed up regime collapse,' she said.


Park said the North had diverted much of the Seoul payments to North Korean workers at the factory park to the Pyongyang leadership which is in charge of nuclear and missile development.
Citing the North's nuclear test last month and long-range rocket launch on February 7, which was widely viewed as a ballistic missile test, Park said it was clear Pyongyang had no intention of discussing denuclearisation.



'If time passes without any change, the Kim Jong-Un leadership – which is speeding without a brake – could deploy a nuclear-tipped missile and we will suffer,' she said.
'It has become clear that we cannot break North Korea's will to develop nuclear weapons through existing means and goodwill.
'It's time to find a fundamental solution for bringing practical change in North Korea and to show courage in putting that into action.'
A similar line is being pushed by the United States and Japan in an effort to secure a strong UN Security Council resolution that will include harsh new sanctions for North Korea.
But Park's speech failed to address the problem the Security Council is having in drafting a resolution that has the support of all five veto-wielding permanent members.
Despite Beijing's annoyance with North Korea's nuclear ambitions and its young maverick leader Kim Jong-Un, its priority has been to prevent chaos on China's border.
As a result, it has resisted punitive measures that might push Kim's regime towards collapse.



Park indicated that South Korea should be more willing to act unilaterally if other countries lagged behind.
'We must throw away the impotent feeling of relying on the international community's sanctions... and mobilise all possible methods to solve the problem ourselves,' she said.
After her speech, the Yonhap news agency cited defence officials in Seoul as saying four US F-22 stealth fighter jets would fly a mission over South Korea on Wednesday in a show of force aimed at Pyongyang.
South Korea is also due to begin talks with the US this week on the possible deployment of an advanced US missile defence system that China and Russia have warned could undermine stability in East Asia.
Defence officials in Seoul and Washington say bringing the Terminal High Altitude Area Defence System (THAAD) to the South has become a clear necessity given the progress North Korea was making on its ballistic missile programme.
But China sees it as a threat to its own nuclear deterrent and Vice Foreign Minister Zhang Yesui reiterated Beijing's concerns during meeting Tuesday with his South Korean counterpart in Seoul.
'We exchanged views on the THAAD issue and the Chinese side expressed its opposition,' Zhang told reporters. 'We hope the relevant sides will act prudently.'


Monday, October 21, 2013

France, China to invest $26bn into next generation of UK nuclear power

Britain has embarked on its first nuclear power station in 20 years, which will start delivering energy to 7 million homes from 2023. The deal agreed by UK, France and China will also cut consumer fuel bills by more than 75 pounds a year from 2030.
Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (Photo from wikipedia.org)
Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (Photo from wikipedia.org)
 
 

China will team up with Electrcite de France SA (EDF) to build two nuclear reactors at the Hinkley Point site in southwest England, the Paris-based utility said in a statement released Monday. This will mark the first nuclear construction since Japan’s Fukushima disaster and the first in Great Britain since the Sizewell B power station opened in 1995.
EDF will hold a 45 to 50 percent stake in the pressurized water reactors that will have the capacity to produce 7 percent of UK electricity and power up to 7 million homes. “This also marks the next generation of nuclear power in Britain,” Prime Minister David Cameron was quoted in the statement.
Under the 35 year contract, the consortium could build a second plant to the Sizewell site in Suffolk. The UK government will provide loan guarantees for 65 percent of the construction financing.
“This deal means 16 billion pounds [$26 billion] of investment coming into the country and the creation of 25,000 jobs,” Cameron said, stressing the important role the project will play in helping the UK meet energy needs.
China General Nuclear Corporation (CGN) and China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) will hold a 30 to 40 percent combined share and Paris- based Areva, will consult on the technology and design and have a 10 percent stake. Up to 15 percent in equity remains up for grabs, and there is a shortlist of candidates which are currently being discussed.
The statement says the project will offer a “fair price for consumers”. It is a timely victory for Cameron as his coalition has come under scrutiny over rising electricity bills and the rising risk of blackouts. The deal is Cameron’s first in an attempt to attract 110 billion pounds of investment into Britain’s outdated electricity industry by 2020.
Electricity prices will be set at 92.5 pounds [$150] per megawatt hour, and lowered to 89.5 pounds [$145.9] if the second Sizewell plant is realized.
Before final contracts are drawn up, EDF is waiting on state-funding from the European Union.
On the last day of his week-long trip to China, British Chancellor George Osborne hinted Chinese investors could grab up to a 100 percent stake in the venture.
Recently China agreed to heavily invest into  the first airport city project in Manchester, estimated at 800 million pounds, and the UK agreed to reform visa applications for Chinese residents.

Monday, June 27, 2011

Top Nuclear Regulator Tours Neb. Nuclear Plant

Top Nuclear Regulator Tours Neb. Nuclear Plant



The chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission says utilities running both of Nebraska's nuclear plants appear to be doing a good job battling Missouri River floodwaters. (June 26)


Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Fukushima nuclear disaster is no different from September 11

Fukushima nuclear disaster is no different from September 11


News magazine "Der Spiegel" the German nuclear disaster in the power plant, the Japanese, "Fukushima" not less than the worst effects of the tragic attacks on New York and Washington on the eleventh of September 2001, and will make it hard to ignore the risks of nuclear technology, noting that it may Objects of the end of nuclear energy.

The magazine said on its website that the nuclear disaster at a plant in Fukushima, resulting from the strong earthquake that hit Japan and generated a tsunami, you might make the German government is subject to the pressures and demands of pro reconsider the decision to extend the reconstruction of the nuclear reactor 12 years on average.

The magazine said that an accident like this in the very advanced state, and developer of nuclear technology, as further evidence that nuclear energy is not safe .. Expected to occur in the Fukushima nuclear crisis repercussions of the same attacks of September eleventh terrorist

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Smoke Pours From Japan Nuclear Plant

Smoke Pours From Japan Nuclear Plant


An explosion at a nuclear power station tore down the walls of one building Saturday as smoke poured out. Japanese officials said they feared the reactor could melt down following the failure of its cooling system in the earthquake and tsunami. (March 12

Saturday, January 1, 2011

America's nuclear, Cold War hysteria

America's nuclear, Cold War hysteria


A recent report shows the Obama Administration is trying to figure out a way to get the word out about a possible attack. The US has released a 130 page report called "Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation", it is about what the United States and its citizens should do in case a nuclear bomb went off at home.


Thursday, December 2, 2010

Obama Gets Powell Backing on START Nuclear Deal

Obama Gets Powell Backing on START Nuclear Deal


President Barack Obama rallied support for a stalled nuclear treaty from former Secretary of State Colin Powell Wednesday, as both men warned of consequences if the Senate fails to ratify the agreement with Russia. (Dec. 1)




Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Alex Jones: WikiLeaks credibility skyrocketing

Alex Jones: WikiLeaks credibility skyrocketing


As people continue to decipher the thousands of US sensitive documents that were released by whistleblowing website WikiLeaks, what will the end result be? Many people believe it shows the government is doing a good job of protecting its citizens and doing the right thing. However, others are saying the documents are incredibly damaging to the US. Radio Host Alex Jones says it will take time to go over all of the documents but most of the information is not a big surprise


Monday, November 29, 2010

Iran Nuclear Scientist Killed, Another Injured

Iran Nuclear Scientist Killed, Another Injured


Iran's state TV says separate but identical bomb attacks have killed a prominent Iranian nuclear scientist and wounded another in the capital.(Nov. 29)


Tuesday, November 23, 2010

NO NO NATO

NO NO NATO


As leaders of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization met in Lisbon, thousands met in the streets for protest of their policies and very existence. The root of many activists' complaints, from the war in Afghanistan to tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, boil down to US policies


Sunday, November 21, 2010

Obama weakening as START ratification looms

Obama weakening as START ratification looms


The START treaty is US President Obama's crown jewel when it comes to his foreign policy objective; however that is in danger due to the GOP holding it up in Congress. If the treaty is not passed before year's end, it will be in major danger of failing once more Republicans join Congress. The Hill columnist Brent Budowsky is optimistic the START treaty will be passed through Congress because many Republicans understand the importance of the treaty


Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Mystery missile over California

Mystery missile over California


A mystery missile was caught on video flying off the coast of Los Angeles, but the Pentagon says they have no clue who launched it


Thursday, October 28, 2010

US Air Force lost 50 nukes

US Air Force lost 50 nukes

What could be considered one of the largest national security failures in US history; 50 United States nuclear missiles went offline over the weekend. It happened at the FE Warren Air base, outside of Cheyenne, Wyoming, the home to a ninth of the US missile stockpile. Ploughshares fund President Joseph Cirincione said the missiles could have done 500X the damage of Hiroshima if launched.



Fidel Castro talks nuclear war to Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

Fidel Castro talks nuclear war to Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

Fidel Castro delivering a message about nuclear war and the potential of the United States using these weapons again, potentially ending the world.


Saturday, October 16, 2010

Exclusive: Hugo Chavez talks to RT

Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, who is in Moscow for talks on cooperation between Russia and Venezuela, has given an exclusive live interview to RT




Chavez/Venezuela not the enemy

Chavez/Venezuela not the enemy


RT sat down for an exclusive interview with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez; most people in the United States view him as an enemy. Meanwhile, outside the US he is seen as a tremendous politician and a leader for the future. RT Contributor Wayne Madsen points out that the US media slams Chavez and that is why US citizens are receiving this anti Chavez propaganda



Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Take me to your ... missiles?

Take me to your ... missiles?

f ET really did want to phone home, the topic of conversation may have been more than just a crush of "I miss you's" and pleasantries. It might have been an exultant expression of scoring really big -- like weapons-of-mass destruction big. What do the little green men want?

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Nuclear treaty: START-ing now?

Nuclear treaty: START-ing now?

US President Barack Obama on Thursday applauded the endorsement by a Senate panel of the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia. So, who would be against reducing nuclear weapons as the START treaty moves forward? Charles Kupchan says that beneath the surface of the START treaty being held up in the Senate were partisan politics and the Republican Party being hesitant to give the Obama administration a win.

START treaty: Victory for Obama?

START treaty: Victory for Obama?


There is some good foreign policy news for President Obama today; perhaps a victory? The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted in favor of the proposed Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia. So, who would be against reducing nuclear weapons as the START treaty moves forward? Some in Congress are saying that the START treaty would force the US to ask Russia for permission to develop their nuclear program.

sharing